Newton

The Introduction into New Physics

Is today's physics in crisis?   ( D.Lj.)
Physics, as a fundamental natural science, shapes the apprehensions of other sciences (both natural and social) with its theories. Its influence on the technique and technologies is direct and absolute. In other words, physics has, from its origins, influenced the human life to a great extent. That influence today is crucial. We can freely state that today’s technological civilization is completely based on the acquisitions that were made by the first physicists. Nevertheless, contemporary physics does not have answers to many essential questions. Regardless of the means invested in expensive experiments and numbers of contradictory theories, like the ones about the origination of the universe – there are no answers that are reliable enough and applicable. It is all telling us that contemporary physics and all other sciences are in crisis – like, our civilization, which, if there are no quick changes, is facing self-destruction. The very life on the Earth is in danger. Its cause may be the contemporary scientifically-methodological paradigm based on the formal logic that very often shackles the varieties of ways in explorations, and along with it discoveries about new truths about the world – and in accordance with them more humane acting. Or, the cause is in the fact that the contemporary science is strictly institutionalized and instrumentalised by the capitalism and serves, in the first place, for the capitalists’ power enlargement, to the detriment of all. There is some truth in both statements. However, today we are in real need of new energy sources and different observations of the reality from the ones that are offered by the contemporary science and which has, long ago, exiled both God and the Spirit. Luckily, there have always been attempts for changes. One of such attempts is here made by the author of The Introduction into New Physics , who, about his physics, briefly states:

Why new physic?
It is because we are once again changing the apprehension of mass. When it was done at the beginning of XX century, new physics emerged. It was then that we transferred mass from the constant measure to the place of the changeable or the relative measure. We accepted the mass relativity in relation to speed (Einstein).

What is changing now in the apprehension of mass?
I am introducing new mass relativity. I say: 'mass is relative in relation to temperature'. Temperature relativity of mass (TRM) introduces completely new notions into physics, and then building up of new physics is inevitable.

What are the new notions?
New notions TRM is introducing into physics are repulsive mass and anti-gravitational force that it generates.

What does TRM tell us?
TRM tells us that a body's mass changes with the temperature change in a way that its attraction quantitatively reduces with the temperature increase, that it can completely lose its attractive character at a certain temperature, and that with further heating, that is temperature increase, it becomes qualitatively repulsive, with the possibility that it quantitatively enhances its repulsion as the T grows. Temperature lowering quantitatively enhances a body's attraction.

How about antigravity?
As the attractive mass generates gravity, the repulsive mass generates antigravity (AG). We have finally accomplished the complete accordance and balance of all the basic natural forces in the sense that they are all attractive-repulsive. Several centuries ago we got to know gravity, now the turn has come to antigravity.

How does the law of mass interactions look now?
Two bodies will be attracted to each other only if they both have the attractive mass, they will not interact if at least one is in the mass zero state, and they will repulse each other if at least one body has repulsive mass.

How does that influence our apprehension of the world?
I would like to emphasize that the hot or the thermo-nuclear fusion is an impossible occurrence. That means that not even the Sun or the other stars in the cosmos generate energy by fusion of H into He, as we have thought up to now.

What is the process in which the stars create energy?
All the stars create energy they emit in the surrounding space anti-gravitationally repulsing the evaporated photospheric substance. That process makes them much more efficient energy creators and that all implies that the stars and the whole universe are much older and that they will live much longer than we have thought.

What else is changing in astrophysics and cosmology?
The apprehension of stars' evolution is changing and it is finally clear that black holes are just one in a series of misapprehensions of an incomplete and mistaken theory. The belief that the cosmos was made in a Big Bang is changing. There were, and there will be explosions in the cosmos. But, there was no Big Bang for it is also an impossible occurrence.

How does TRM influence Newton's physics?
Newton introduced the notion of mass into physics, believing it was a constant measure. TRM demands a change in the basic laws of Newton’s mechanics.

How does TRM influence Einstein's theory of relativity?
Time and space are relative, but the mathematics Einstein used to describe his Special and General theories of relativity is wrong. That is why those theories cannot survive in the new physics.

Is there anything constant in the new physics?
Yes, what is constant is the incessant change. All physics' 'constants' are changeable measures and they describe the quality of space to us.

And what about the quantity of the space?
For the quantity of the space we only need three dimensions. Only three! Not more than three! Therefore, three!

Many more details and explanations about the whole issue can be found in the book The Introduction into New Physics, which you can order on the page Book. You can also join the discussion on the forum.